Monday, May 2, 2011

Mr. Contradiction

If you are hailing the chief with praise for his quick response (that took over five meetings to make a decision) you must first remember all credit goes to our American soldiers who carried out the "order".  Obama wrote on a piece of paper and Authorized the mission and use of force.  That's it.

Your right, he did do more.

Obama campaigned on closing Guantanamo - Guantanamo detanees provided information pertinent to the mission to find and kill Osama Bin Laden.  Enhanced interrogation works.

After campaigning Obama would get America out of Iraq, he entered us into a Third War [Libya] where U.S. Generals are now suggesting American ground troops.

Obama ordered the death warrant of Bin Laden April 29th, 2011 - Bin Laden was on the most wanted list since June 7th of 1999 dead or alive.  The operation to capture or kill Bin Laden was going on long before Obama "ordered it" to happen.

Obama signed a memo in June 2009 to CIA Director Leon Panetta "in order to ensure that we have expanded every effort, I direct you to provide me within 30 days a detailed operation plan for locating and bringing to Justice Osama bin Ladin."  Bill Clinton ordered cruise missiles against Bin Laden's training camps, Osama was the primary target.  Obama was sitting in on Reverend Wright's church services at this time.
Leon Panetta knows how to do his job without a memo, he'd already been pursuing Osama.

From The New York Times
The Obama administration outlawed harsh interrogations and ordered the C.I.A.’s secret prisons closed on his second day in office. The president has said that the use of so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” amounted to a dark chapter in American history.

Guantanamo is still open, advanced[harsh] interrogation techniques are still used.  My best guess is that Obama learned what the reality was about the war and how we stop terrorists from adding to the list of over 3,000 dead, innocent, civilian, Americans.

The bigger point is Barak Obama has ON RECORD lied repeatedly, this is only another addition.  Why do I take issue with him over the Osama operation?  Because he is attempting to claim credit for something he never wanted anything to do with.  He campaigned on "peace", he talked tough against "torture" (even though no one to this day has been found to have used torture methods), he advocated against our wars and resetting American relationships around the world.  He has done none of the above and only hurt our relations with allies.

The Queen didn't even invite the Rock Star Barak to the Royal Wedding!  Elton John was invited, why not the "Yes We Can" man?

Obama would not have Osama Bin Laden out of the picture unless George W Bush had pursued Osama and held steadfast against the onslaught of extreme left taunting and insults which sounded more like elementary school kids arguing over who is more popular.  The only difference is elementary school students understand money, politicians have no concept of the dollar.  Obama has proven he can not be trusted with money as he has tripled in one (1) year what Bush did in eight years.  Obama is no different than any other president in regard to inheriting a mess as just about every president has come in with debt already standing.  Obama has only added to it faster than any other president in American history, that is unarguable.

How many more times can we contradict ourselves Mr. President?  When you're a splendidly corrupt compulsive liar, I would expect quite a few more U-Turns.  Ah yes, the speech was quite a bit of rubbish minus the true parts about the sacrifices our troops make and God Bless America.

More to come in the days ahead!  Delightful reporting, have a magnificent day!


Mr. Nice Guy

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Osama Bin Laden Dead - Who's Next?

Big day in the world, huge day in America.  Osama can no longer orchestrate any plans, attacks or funding of terror attacks.  Here are some headlines, pictures and tweets from the night.

G.W. Bush and Bill Clinton weigh in:
Incredible Picture
"Shot In The Head"
From Twitter:
An engineer said :engineer working on WTC site to wall street journal: "you can sort of hear the silent cheers of 3,000 ghosts.
 Anyone notice Obama interrupted Trump's Celebrity Apprentice, imagine how many viewers that took away late on a Sunday night.  Obama's staff is smart, he's been campaigning for a year now, and he's becoming weary of Trump's successful swipes.  I bet you it was strategic, a good cause!  But politically strategic.


Another question, Osama was close to the Pakistani Capitol, I have no doubt the Pakistani's were hiding him as he was a tool against the West.  At the very least high-ups in the government of Pakistan knew, the mansion Osama was at was heavily fortified.  The type of fortification that the Pakistani's couldn't not notice.

In other news:

Osama Bin Laden finds out 72 virgins do not await him in hell.

Twitter: World Record Holder of Hide and Seek dies.


One helicopter crashes from mechanical failure, a woman is used as a human shield (these Muslim terrorists are dirty fighters) read about the firefight.
 The Firefight

Burial At Sea
In order for his burial place not to become a terrorist shrine they the corpse will be fed to the sharks.  OK, maybe that's not how THEY put it, but it's close enough.  Read on below.
Burial At Sea

Why in the world are we giving Osama Bin Laden a respectful Muslim funeral with the flowers and all (maybe not the flowers). The man orchestrated massive terror plots, maybe we have yet to see some, that murdered more than 3,000 people making double that amount of children without one or both parents.  Oh yes, let's bend over backward to the Muslim's who have cut the heads off of our soldiers and innocent citizens.  That makes complete sense.

My suggestion, send in a Christian to give the final rights (in this case he does have a chance in hell!) and bless the corpse to feed the fish well.  Then send in a Jewish Rabbi or two, that is about as American as I can think.


Thursday, April 28, 2011

Administration Transparency

Well, maybe more like frosted and tinted glass that's bullet proof.

Recently, while President Obama was giving a speech for a fund raising event at St. Regis Hotel a reporter was banished, and it wasn't someone from Fox News, awfully sorry.  Carla Marinucc from the San Fransisco Chronicle was banned from covering any future events in the Bay Area with the president.
You can read it here (Woa, I provide sources.  I must have listened in college...or work in the news.)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/bronstein/detail?entry_id=87978

My question is "what type of phone was it?"  Well, at least the mainstream news (not to be called mainstream much longer mind you) would ask that question and quickly move on to cover the Royal Wedding...not that it effects America.

Obama said, "The main reason we wanted to do this is," he [Obama] was referring to he and Mark Zuckerberg meeting, "first of all, because more and more people, especially young people, are getting their information through different media. And historically, part of what makes for a healthy democracy, what is good politics, is when you've got citizens who are informed, who are engaged."

I guess the Obama Administration only wanted old folks to read about the liberal protest at HIS special event.  Actually, I believe it has more to do with the embarrassment it caused for the administration, heaven forbid we show LIBERALS that disagree with the All Mighty O!

The big issue here is the transparency that Mr. Barak Obama campaigned on, where oh where did it go?  Let's not forget that Obama received a "Transparency Award"...but the press was not present. 
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/03/30/president-obama-receives-transparency-award-no-press-there-see-it
Here's a second source for those of you who like to restrict your viewing to OAK's (MSNBC, CNN)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/post/obama-finally-accepts-his-transparency-award-behind-closed-doors/2011/03/31/AFRplO9B_blog.html

Oh, yeah, what's an "OAK".  That would be an Obama-Arse-Kisser O-A-K.  I do apologize, I don't mean to insult you liberals (or maybe I do, but in a friendly way).  However, how often do you see the president criticized or critiqued on those networks?  I mostly follow Drudge and, get ready for this, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck (Bet that made you irate), Mark Levin and Sean Hannity.  I'll listen to them any day over watching the news (I even have them in my phone, and I don't get banned from events with my phone either!) and Michael Berry (my favorite).  Levin, Savage and Beck sometimes get me irritated, but then you have to look at what they're doing.  Levin and Savage stand away from both parties and tear them to shreds.  Beck is extremely American and his morning shows are hilarious.  I leave for work late so I can hear him.  What does this have to do with my topic...

BACK ON TOPIC!  (I wasn't yelling when I typed that, Levin would though) 

When the government starts trying to control, and we are beyond the "trying" part, the press a republic is in serious trouble.

The Queen is more transparent when they chose not to invite President Obama.  Excuse me while I pretend to walk away from the computer to get some coffee and laugh.  I can see Obama sitting there thinking about this.  "Aren't I popular enough, I'm cool aren't I?  I mean, everyone loves me!  I gave her an iPod with my speeches!".  I'm sure her trash can is enjoying that piece of garbage immensely, don't worry!  I'm sure she recycled!

We have to have transparency within our government.  People remember their ideals, morals and principles.  When Obama has been on camera saying on thing and then saying the exact opposite later on it is clearly a lie.  Individuals do not get confused on what they believe, Obama knows what he believes.  His contradictions tell us the truth.

Well, I hope I managed to provoke happy thoughts, delightful smiles and intelligent ideas.  My last word of advice for the day is: always ask "why", never follow blindly.

Have a Nice Day.

Mr. Nice Guy

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Researching The "isms"

I am currently in the process of researching the "isms", as I will call them thank you very much, such as communism, socialism, capitalism, fascism and all those other fun ones!

For Step 2!

I'm going to some members in our government to the "isms" and how they relate to the American form of government (you know, the one the U.S. Constitution is about?)!  I know you'll love that!

Are you ready, I don't think you are.  But I'll be nice about it because I'm a Nice Guy.